ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
Development and validation of a nomogram-based model to predict combined esophageal injury post-esophagoscopy for esophageal foreign bodies.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to create and validate a nomogram model for predicting complications of esophageal injury post-esophagoscopy in patients with esophageal foreign bodies (EFB).
methodsWe examined 303 patients who underwent esophagoscopy from January 2019 to December 2022 at a leading hospital in Anhui, known for its expertise in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery. The patients were split into a modeling group and a validation group in a 7:3 ratio. Logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the risk factors for esophageal injury after undergoing esophagoscopy in patients with EFB. Based on these factors, a nomogram risk prediction model was developed and assessed using a goodness of fit test.
resultsLogistic regression analysis revealed that the type of foreign body, failure of gastroscopic retrieval, duration of lodgment, lodgment site, and presence of combined cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases were significant (p < 0.05) independent risk factors for esophageal injury following esophagoscopy for EFB. The area under the ROC curve for the training set was 0.850, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test resulted in a p value of 0.908. For the validation set, the area under the ROC curve was 0.848, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test gave a p value of 0.665. The calibration curve showed a close alignment between the predicted and observed values.
conclusionThe type of foreign body, duration of lodgment, lodgment site, previous failure of gastroscopic retrieval, and history of combined cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases are significant risk factors for esophageal injury following EFB esophagoscopy. This model accurately quantifies the risk of esophageal injury after EFB esophagoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39402230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.