Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39402229›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2024

Rectal stenosis after circular mechanical anastomosis; the influence of stapler size.

Núria Llorach-Perucho, Ladislao Cayetano-Paniagua, Pau Esteve-Monja, Albert Garcia-Nalda, Josep Bargalló, Xavier Serra-Aracil

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Núria Llorach-PeruchoColoproctology Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Service, Parc Tauli University Hospital, Sabadell. Institut d'investigació i innovació Parc Tauli I3PT-CERCA, Sabadell (Barcelona), Spain.
Ladislao Cayetano-PaniaguaColoproctology Unit, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa (Barcelona), Spain.
Pau Esteve-MonjaInstitut d'investigació I Innovació Parc Tauli I3PT-CERCA, Sabadell (Barcelona), Spain.
Albert Garcia-NaldaColoproctology Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Service, Parc Tauli University Hospital, Sabadell. Institut d'investigació i innovació Parc Tauli I3PT-CERCA, Sabadell (Barcelona), Spain.
Josep BargallóColoproctology Unit, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa (Barcelona), Spain.
Xavier Serra-AracilColoproctology Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Service, Parc Tauli University Hospital, Sabadell. Institut d'investigació i innovació Parc Tauli I3PT-CERCA, Sabadell (Barcelona), Spain. Javier.Serra@uab.cat.ORCID 0000-0003-0291-1900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of benign anastomotic stenosis (BAS) after radical surgery for rectal cancer ranges from 2 to 30%. There are few data regarding the factors related to its occurrence. One of these factors is the diameter of the circular mechanical staplers (CMS) used.

methodsObservational study with prospective data recording of consecutive patients with non-disseminated rectal cancer operated on at two hospitals with special dedication to rectal cancer. Patients underwent low anterior resection (LAR) of the rectum with colorectal anastomosis created using CMS of diameters of either 28-29 or 31-33 mm. The primary endpoint was BAS. Secondary variables were demographic and patient-dependent data, and preoperative, intraoperative, immediate postoperative and mid-term data. The incidence of BAS was compared in the groups in which the different stapler diameters were used.

resultsBetween 2012 and 2022, 239 patients were included. BAS was recorded in 39 (16.3%). In the analysis of factors related to its occurrence, the only significant variable was stapler diameter (p = 0.002, 95% CI 7.27-23.53), since rates of BAS were lower in the 31-33 mm group. Similarly, in the logistic regression analysis, stapler size was not associated with postoperative complications or anastomotic dehiscence (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.5). Comparing stapler groups, BAS was detected in 35 of 165 patients (21%) in the 28-29 mm group but in only four out of 74 (5.6%) in the 31-33 mm group (p = 0.002, 95% CI 7.27-23.53). Ileostomy closure took longer and was less frequent in the 28-29 mm group.

conclusionsThe rate of BAS after LAR was not negligible, since it was recorded in 39 of 239 patients (16.3%). The use of a 31-33 mm CMS was associated with a lower incidence of BAS. Therefore, the use of larger staplers is tentatively recommended; however, clinical trials are now required to confirm these results.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalPostoperative ComplicationsRectal NeoplasmsSurgical StaplersAdultAgedConstriction, PathologicEquipment DesignFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRectal DiseasesRectumBenign anastomotic stenosisCircular mechanical staplersColorectal anastomosisLow anterior resection of the rectum

Identifiers

PMID39402229
PMCPMC11614982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.