ArticleScientific reports2024
Learning mimetic cuckoo call innovations from neighbors in a Chinese songbird.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Some oscine passerines incorporate heterospecific sounds into their repertoires, including vocalizations of other bird species, sounds of other fauna, and even anthropogenic sounds, through vocal mimicry. However, few studies have investigated whether mimics learn heterospecific sounds from model species or from conspecific tutors. Here, we investigate mimicry acquisition using innovation in Cuculidae calls imitated by the Chinese blackbird (Turdus mandarinus). If the mimicry innovation arises and spreads among several neighbors and is not produced by model species, the mimicry must be acquired partially from conspecifics. We found that: (1) Cuculidae calls imitated by blackbirds were reasonably accurate, but with some differences between mimetic and real calls in acoustic structures. (2) We identified four unique mimetic units (mimicry innovation or copy errors), and these units only occurred at certain sites and were shared by several neighbors. In aggregate, frequency parameters (the first principal component) of unique mimetic units were higher than usual mimetic units (p < 0.001). Our findings provide further evidence that mimetic units can be partially learnt from conspecifics based on four cases of unique mimetic units. Our study and approach provide a reference and theoretical basis for the future understanding of social learning and development of vocal mimicry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.