Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39402160›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Limited utility of subendometrial enhancement in assessing the interface between the endometrium and myometrium.

Sang Youn Kim, Myoung Seok Lee, Min Hoan Moon, Chang Kyu Sung, Sohee Oh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sang Youn KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4038-7345
Myoung Seok LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 5 Gil 20, Boramae-Road, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5285-4874
Min Hoan MoonDepartment of Radiology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 5 Gil 20, Boramae-Road, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea. mmhoan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-2895
Chang Kyu SungDepartment of Radiology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 5 Gil 20, Boramae-Road, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-5107
Sohee OhMedical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3010-448X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to re-evaluate the utility of subendometrial enhancement (SEE) in assessing the interface between the endometrium and myometrium. In total, 110 women who underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for non-endometrial gynecologic diseases were enrolled in this prospective study. Two radiologists independently assessed the presence or absence of subendometrial enhancement (SEE) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI. A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of menstrual status on the detection of SEE. Identified areas of SEE were rated using a 4-point Likert scale to determine their reliability in assessing the interface between the endometrium and myometrium. SEE was identified in 44.5% (49/110) of cases by radiologist 1 and in 39.1% (43/110) by radiologist 2. A subgroup analysis indicated no significant differences in the detection of SEE based on menstrual status. The identified areas of SEE were deemed reliable for assessing the interface between the endometrium and myometrium in 24.5% (12/49) of the cases evaluated by radiologist 1 and in 32.6% (14/43) of those evaluated by radiologist 2. Among the 110 women studied, reliable areas of SEE for assessing the interface between the endometrium and myometrium were observed in 10.9% (n = 12) by radiologist 1 and 12.7% (n = 14) by radiologist 2. The evaluation of SEE using dynamic CE MRI may be limited in its ability to assess the interface between the endometrium and myometrium.

Indexed as

EndometriumMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyometriumAdultAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage EnhancementMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultContrast MediaContrast mediaEndometrial neoplasmFemale genitaliaMagnetic resonance imagingUterus

Identifiers

PMID39402160
PMCPMC11473818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.