ArticleScientific reports2024
Improvement of electro-Fenton process by using heterogeneous Fe-MIL-88B nanocatalyst and simultaneous rotation of cathode and anode for dye removal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microwave-assisted electro-peroxone process for rapid removal of high-concentration recalcitrant dye solutions.iScience · 2026Article
- Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensors for the Determination of Pharmaceutical- and Agricultural-Based Emerging Contaminants in Water.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, improvement of the electro-Fenton process using Fe-MIL-88B along with the innovation in the reactor with the simultaneous rotation of the cathodes and anodes was carried out to remove Acid Blue 25. For this purpose, the Fe-MIL-88B nanocatalyst was synthesised by the thermal solvent method and was characterised by FT-IR, EDAX, XRD, and FESEM. For the experiments, an electrochemical cell with a useful volume of 1 L and rotating cathodes and anodes were used and nanoparticles were added to the system as a slurry. To determine the appropriate values of the effective parameters, the OFAT method was used. According to the results, 0.3 g/L Fe-MIL-88B, pH equal to 3, dye concentration of 75 mg/L, a current intensity of 0.228 A, and a rotation velocity of 100 rpm were chosen as suitable values for the process. In optimal conditions, the dye removal efficiency reached to 92.3% after 90 min, which resulted in a 14.5% improvement in the dye removal efficiency compared to the conventional process under the same conditions. Also, after 90 min, the removal efficiencies of 77.08 and 63.63% were obtained for COD and TOC, respectively. The results indicated acceptable decomposition of the effluent into less hazardous compounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.