ArticleScientific reports2024
Hybrid machine learning approach for accurate prediction of the drilling rock index.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The drilling rate index (DRI) of rocks is important for optimizing drilling operations, as it informs the choice of appropriate methods and equipment, ultimately improving the efficiency of rock excavation projects. This study presents a hybrid machine learning approach to predict the DRI of rocks accurately. By integrating grey wolf optimization with support vector machine (GWO-SVM), random forest (GWO-RF), and extreme gradient boosting (GWO-XGBoost) models, the aim was to enhance predictive accuracy. Among these, the GWO-XGBoost model exhibited superior predictive performance, achieving a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.999, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.00043, root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.98017, and severity index (SI) of 0.0350 during training. Testing results confirmed its accuracy with R² of 0.999, MAE of 0.00038, RMSE of 1.80790, and SI of 0.0312. Furthermore, the GWO-XGBoost model outperformed the other models in terms of precision, recall, f1-score, and multi-class confusion matrix results for each DRI class. The GWO-RF model also demonstrated high accuracy, ranking second, while the GWO-SVM model showed comparatively lower performance. This research aims to advance rock excavation practices by providing a highly accurate and reliable tool for DRI prediction. The results highlight the significant potential of the GWO-XGBoost model in improving DRI predictions, offering valuable intuitions and practical applications in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.