ArticleScientific reports2024
Effect of different genetic backgrounds on rumen microbiota and serum metabolic phenotypes in beef cattle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of triticale silage substitution for corn silage on growth performance, serum biomarkers, rumen fermentation, and rumen bacterial community of Pingliang Red Cattle.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Wuwei Jianpi San Improves Growth Performance and Immune Status in Yaks Through Modulation of Rumen Microbiota and Host Metabolism.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Effects on Rumen Microbial Population and Serum Biochemical Responses to Guanidinoacetic Acid,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Metagenomic sequencing reveals the taxonomic and functional characteristics of rumen microorganisms in Dongliu buffalo.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Species with different genetic backgrounds exhibit distinct metabolic traits. Nine beef cattle were selected for the experiment to study changes in serum metabolic phenotypes, rumen microbiota diversity, and composition in beef cattle from different genetic backgrounds. Three groups were Chinese Simmental (S group), Simmental×Chinese Holstein (SH group), and Simmental × Mongolian (SM group) cattle. We used ELISA to detect serum biochemical indicators. The Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in the rumen were examined, and a significant difference was observed in the acetic acid content of the three experimental groups (p < 0.01). The propionic acid content in the rumen of the S group was significantly higher than that of the SH and SM groups (p < 0.05). The A/P ratios of both the S and SM groups were significantly higher than that of the SH group (p < 0.05). We analyzed rumen microbiota composition and diversity in each group of cattle using 16 S rRNA sequencing and found that their composition was generally similar in the three groups of crossbred fattening cattle; however, the f_Bacteroidales_RF16_group and g_norank_f_Bacteroidales_RF16_group were significantly enriched in the SH group, whereas Treponema and Spirochaetia were significantly enriched in the SM group. Spirochaetia was significantly enriched in the SM group. Differences in rumen bacterial enrichment indicated that starch, protein, and cellulolytic abilities differed among the S, SH, and SM groups. The results of Spearman correlation analysis confirmed the correlation between rumen genera and serum biochemical indices. Overall, differences in rumen microflora play an important role in influencing the serum metabolic phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.