Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39402023›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2024

Apatinib plus hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: phase II trial.

Shiguang Chen, Xiangdong Wang, Bo Yuan, Jianyang Peng, Qingxian Zhang, Wenchang Yu, Naijian Ge, Zhicheng Weng, Jinqi Huang, Weifu Liu and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shiguang ChenClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xiangdong Wang *Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/ Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Bo Yuan *Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Jianyang Peng *Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Qingxian Zhang *the First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, China.
Wenchang YuClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Naijian GeEastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/ Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhicheng WengAffiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Jinqi Huangthe First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, China.
Weifu LiuClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaolong WangClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Chuanben ChenClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China. ccb@fjmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8212-2663

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation) 2019Y0060Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation) 2023J011248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ultimately experience tumor progression after first-line systemic therapies. Systemic therapy is generally recommended as second-line treatment for advanced HCC in the major guidelines. Combining apatinib with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) likely drives synergistic activity on advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis. This phase II trial (ChiCTR2000029082) aimed to assess efficacy and safety of this combination in patients with HCC with extrahepatic metastasis who have progressed after first-line systemic therapies. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progress-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), 6- and 12-month survival rates, overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Thirty-nine patients received oral treatment with apatinib, and hepatic artery infusion oxaliplatinplus raltitrexed. Per RECIST v1.1, the ORR and DCR was 53.8% and 89.7% in the patients population, respectively. The median PFS and OS was 6.2 months and 11.3 months, respectively. The 6- and 12-month survival rates were 81.7% and 44.1%, respectively. All AEs were manageable by medication or dose modifications. Apatinib plus HAIC for second-line therapy in advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis shows promising efficacy and manageable toxicities.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularHepatic ArteryInfusions, Intra-ArterialLiver NeoplasmsOxaliplatinPyridinesQuinazolinesThiophenesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisapatinibOxaliplatinPyridinesQuinazolinesraltitrexedThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID39402023
PMCPMC11473759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.