ArticleInternational wound journal2024
Retention processed placental membrane versus standard of care in treating diabetic foot ulcers.
Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retention processed placental membrane versus standard of care in treating diabetic foot ulcers.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a severe complication for diabetic patients, significantly impacting patient quality of life and healthcare system efficiency. Traditional standard of care (SOC) treatments are inadequate for many patients, necessitating the use of advanced wound care products, such as human placental membranes. We studied a real-world population of large, hard-to-heal and complicated wounds, otherwise under-studied in the wound care literature. To this end, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis to compare the effectiveness of a human placental amnion/chorion membrane product using retention-based processing (RE-AC) and SOC in managing chronic DFUs. During the study period of September 2021 through April 2024, we collected retrospective observational data from electronic health records of 21 patients treated with RE-AC at three outpatient wound care centres. Additionally, 21 control SOC patients were matched from a wound registry using Coarsened Exact Matching. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on whether they received RE-AC or SOC. Key metrics included wound size progression and wound closure. The analysis employed Bayesian regression and Hurdle Gamma Analysis of Covariance models. Despite their rather large size (average of 13.8 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.