Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39401971›Full record

ReviewBMJ paediatrics open2024

Impact of climate change on child outcomes: an evidence gap map review.

Salima Meherali, Yared Asmare Aynalem, Saba Un Nisa, Megan Kennedy, Bukola Salami, Samuel Adjorlolo, Parveen Ali, Kênia Lara Silva, Lydia Aziato, Solina Richter and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ paediatrics open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Salima MeheraliUniversity of Alberta Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada meherali@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8132-8600
Yared Asmare AynalemFaculty of Nursing Edmonton, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3005-2296
Saba Un NisaFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6818-9907
Megan KennedyJohn W. Scott Health Sciences Librarian, University of Alberta Libraries, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2337-6441
Bukola SalamiFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1030-0464
Samuel Adjorlolo5Department of Mental Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9308-6031
Parveen AliSchool of Allied Health Professions, Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sheffield Jessop Hospital for Women, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7839-8130
Kênia Lara SilvaDepartamento de Enfermagem Aplicada, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-2122
Lydia AziatoUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Solina RichterCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Zohra S LassiRobinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5350-6334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClimate change and extreme weather events significantly threaten neonatal and child health. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current evidence on the impact of climate change on child health, using the evidence gap map (EGM) to address knowledge gaps and establish a foundation for evidence-based interventions and future research.

methodFrom inception, academic databases (such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, CINAHL and Scopus) and grey literature were systematically searched. We included climate change-related studies involving children aged 0-5 worldwide. Covidence facilitated a rigorous screening process, and we conducted a critical appraisal. Two independent reviewers handled screening and data extraction. Eligible studies underwent coding and extraction using Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (EPPI) reviewer software. The EGM was constructed using EPPI Mapper, and comprehensive findings were presented through live links and figures.

resultWe identified 196 studies, comprising 59.2% children and 40.8% neonates, with diverse research approaches, including 94% quantitative studies. There has been a notable increase in research publications over the past 5 years. Evidence is heavily concentrated in Asia (93 studies) and Africa (47 studies). The most frequently studied exposures are those related to extreme climate events, followed by drought and floods. However, there are gaps in the study of extreme cold and storms. The significant outcomes comprised preterm birth (55 studies), low birth weight (27 studies), malnutrition (59 studies) and diarrhoeal diseases (28 studies). Evidence on mental health problems and congenital disabilities receives relatively less attention.

conclusionThis EGM is crucial for researchers, policymakers and practitioners. It highlights knowledge gaps and guides future research to address the evolving threats of climate change to global child health. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202370086.

Indexed as

Child HealthClimate ChangeChild, PreschoolEvidence GapsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornChild HealthEpidemiologyInfantMortalityNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID39401971
PMCPMC11474898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.