ArticleBMJ open2024
Artificial intelligence-based CT-free quantitative thyroid SPECT for thyrotoxicosis: study protocol of a multicentre, prospective, non-inferiority study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Patient Selection to Surveillance: Artificial Intelligence Applications in Radioiodine Therapy - A Systematic Review.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Prognostic significance of early cortical functional integrity measured byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTechnetium thyroid uptake (TcTU) measured by single-photon emission CT/CT (SPECT/CT) is an important diagnostic tool for the differential diagnosis of Graves' disease and destructive thyroiditis. Artificial intelligence (AI) may reduce CT-induced radiation exposure by substituting the role of CT in attenuation correction (AC) and thyroid segmentation, thus realising CT-free SPECT. This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy for the differential diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis between CT-free SPECT and SPECT/CT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The AI-based CT-free SPECT is a single-blind, multicentre, prospective, non-inferiority, clinical trial with a paired design conducted in the Republic of Korea. Eligible participants are adult (≥19 years old) thyrotoxicosis patients without a previous history of hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism. Approximately 160 subjects will be screened for quantitative thyroid SPECT/CT using Tc-99m pertechnetate. CT-free thyroid SPECT will be realised using only SPECT data by the trained convolutional neural networks. TcTU will be calculated by SPECT/CT and CT-free SPECT in each subject. The primary endpoint is the accuracy of diagnosing Graves' disease using TcTU. The trial will continue until 152 completed datasets have been enrolled to assess whether the 95% (two-sided) lower confidence limit of the accuracy difference (CT-free SPECT accuracy-SPECT/CT accuracy) for Graves' disease is greater than -0.1. The secondary endpoints include the accuracy of diagnosing destructive thyroiditis and predicting the need for antithyroid drug prescription within 1 month of the SPECT/CT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the institutional review board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (IRB No. B-2304-824-301), Konkuk University Medical Center (IRB No. 2023-05-022-006) and Chonnam National University Hospital (IRB No. CNUH-2023-108). Findings will be disseminated as reports, presentations and peer-reviewed journal articles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0008387, Clinical Research Information Service of the Republic of Korea (CRIS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.