ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2024
Association of Clinical Findings With Complications in the Cubitus Varus Deformity After Supracondylar Fracture.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Open supracondylar humerus fractures in children: Associated injuries and clinical outcomes.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCubitus varus deformity is primarily a cosmetic complaint that causes some early and late complications. However, no studies have reported the cubitus varus deformity regarding the frequency of complications, relationship to the degree of deformity, and period from the occurrence of the initial injury.
methodsOverall, 83 patients with cubitus varus deformity were examined. The differences in the humerus-elbow-wrist angle (∆HEW-A), tilting angle (∆TA), and internal rotation angle (∆IRA) between the affected and normal sides were measured to determine varus and extension and internal rotation deformity. The period from the occurrence of the initial injury to the evaluation date was also investigated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the explanatory variables (period, ∆HEW-A, ∆TA, and ∆IRA) independently associated with complication events. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was also conducted to predict the risk of events.
results∆HEW-A was independently associated with the risk of cosmetic complaint (odds ratio [OR], 1.171; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.056 to 1.336) and instability (OR, 1.111; 95% CI, 1.028 to 1.200). ∆TA was independently associated with the risk of limited elbow motion (OR, 1.176; 95% CI, 1.077 to 1.285) and sports disability (OR, 0.892; 95% CI, 0.836 to 0.952). The period from the occurrence of the initial injury was independently associated with risk of pain (OR, 1.063; 95% CI, 1.019 to 1.108), ulnar nerve neuropathy (OR, 1.065; 95% CI, 1.011 to 1.125), and osteoarthritis (OR, 1.188; 95% CI, 1.098 to 1.286). The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the optimal cutoffs of 20° and 27° for ∆HEW-A to predict cosmetic complaint and instability; of 25° for ∆TA to predict limited elbow motion; and of 8.8, 8.0, and 16.0 years for the period to predict pain, ulnar nerve neuropathy, and osteoarthritis, respectively. DISCUSSION: The treatment of cubitus varus deformity should be determined because a residual deformity >20° of varus and 25° of extension could develop risk of complications over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.