Observational studyPloS one2024
Comparison of fetal growth patterns from Western India with Intergrowth-21st.
Observational study in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Agreement Between WHO and Thai Fetal Growth Charts for Classifying Estimated Fetal Weight in Thai Singleton Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo generate longitudinal fetal growth data in an Indian population and compare it with Intergrowth-21st. MATERIAL AND
methodsFetal biometry data was collected in a prospective longitudinal observational study (REVAMP: Research Exploring Various Aspects and Mechanisms in Preeclampsia) from 2017 to 2022. Fetal crown-rump length (CRL) was measured at 11-14 weeks gestation, and biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) at 18-22 and 32-35 weeks, and converted into Z-scores using the Intergrowth standard. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) models were used to construct fetal growth centile curves compared against Intergrowth centiles.
resultsOut of 1096 singleton pregnancies in REVAMP, this analysis included 655 'healthy' pregnancies (uncomplicated by pre-eclampsia, diabetes, pre-term delivery or low birth weight) and a sub-set of 106 'low-risk' pregnancies defined using Intergrowth criteria. The 'healthy' study subjects showed lower mean CRL Z-score [-0.45 SD (95% CI:-0.54,-0.37)] at 11-14 weeks, and BPD Z-score [-1.2 SD (-1.28,-1.11) and -1.17 SD (-1.23,-1.1)] at 18-22 and 32-35 weeks respectively. Mean HC Z-score was comparable to the Intergrowth standard at 18-22 weeks [-0.08 SD (-0.16, 0.02)] but smaller at 32-35 weeks [-0.25 SD (-0.32,-0.19)]. Mean AC Z-score was lower at 18-22 weeks [-0.32 SD (-0.41,-0.23)] but comparable at 32-35 weeks [0.004 SD (-0.07, 0.07)]. FL was comparable to or larger than the Intergrowth standard at both time points [0.05 SD (-0.05, 0.14); 0.82 SD (0.75, 0.89), respectively]. These findings were similar, though measurements were slightly larger, in the 'low-risk' sample.
conclusionsThis data from healthy and low-risk pregnant women in urban western India indicates that some fetal dimensions and growth trajectories differ significantly from the Intergrowth-21st. Our data suggest the need for a larger representative study to define a population-specific fetal growth reference for India, for identification of fetal growth restriction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.