Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39401208›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Impact of different blood pressure targets on cerebral hemodynamics in septic shock: A prospective pilot study protocol-SEPSIS-BRAIN.

Pedro Cury, Rogério da Hora Passos, Fernanda Alves, Sérgio Brasil, Gustavo Frigieri, Fabio S Taccone, Ronney B Panerai, Juliana Caldas

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05833607 (Effects of Systemic Blood Pressure Targets on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05833607 unknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Systemic Blood Pressure Targets on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Septic Shock: a Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorD'Or Institute for Research and EducationRan2022 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsSeptic Shock, Cerebral Autoregulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pedro CuryCritical Care Unit, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5247-6348
Rogério da Hora PassosHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fernanda AlvesCritical Care Unit, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Salvador, Brazil.
Sérgio BrasilUniversity of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2397-9947
Gustavo FrigieriMedical Investigation Laboratory 62, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabio S TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Ronney B PaneraiDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Juliana CaldasCritical Care Unit, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Salvador, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeptic shock, a life-threatening condition, can result in cerebral dysfunction and heightened mortality rates. In these patients, disturbances in cerebral hemodynamics, as reflected by impairment of myogenic cerebral autoregulation (CA), metabolic regulation, expressed by critical closing pressure (CrCP) and reductions in intracranial compliance (ICC), can adversely impact septic shock outcomes. The general recommendation is to maintain a target mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg but the effect of different MAP targets on cerebral hemodynamics in these patients is not clear and optimal targets might be dependent on the status of CA. This protocol aims to assess the cerebral hemodynamics profile at different pressure targets in septic shock patients.

methodsProspective, non-randomized, single-center trial, which will study cerebral hemodynamics in patients with septic shock within 48 hours of its onset. Patients will be studied at their baseline MAP and at three MAP targets (T1: 65, T2: 75, T3: 85 mmHg). Cerebral hemodynamics will be assessed by transcranial Doppler (TCD) and a skull micro-deformation sensor (B4C). Dynamic CA will be expressed by the autoregulation index (ARI), calculated by transfer function analysis, using fluctuations of MAP as input and corresponding oscillations in cerebral blood velocity (CBv). The instantaneous relationship between arterial blood pressure and CBv will be used to estimate CrCP and resistance-area product (RAP) for each cardiac cycle using the first harmonic method. The B4C will access ICC by intracranial pressure waveforms (P2/P1). The primary aim is to assess cerebral hemodynamics (ARI, CrCP, RAP, and P2/P1) at different targets of MAP in septic shock patients. Our secondary objective is to assess cerebral hemodynamics at 65mmHg (target recommended by guidelines). In addition, we will assess the correlation between markers of organ dysfunction (such as lactate levels, vasoactive drugs usage, SOFA score, and delirium) and CA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this study may help to understand the effect of the recommended MAP and variations in blood pressure in patients with septic shock and impaired CA and ICC. Furthermore, the results can assist large trials in establishing new hypotheses about neurological management in this group of patients. Approval was obtained from the local Ethics Committee (28134720.1.0000.0048). It is anticipated that the results of this study will be presented at national and international conferences and will be published in peer-reviewed journals in 2024 and 2025.

trial registrationTrial registration number: NCT05833607. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05833607.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationHemodynamicsShock, SepticArterial PressureBlood PressureBrainFemaleHomeostasisHumansMalePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial

Identifiers

PMID39401208
PMCPMC11472940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.