ArticlePloS one2024
Impact of different blood pressure targets on cerebral hemodynamics in septic shock: A prospective pilot study protocol-SEPSIS-BRAIN.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05833607 (Effects of Systemic Blood Pressure Targets on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Systemic Blood Pressure Targets on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Septic Shock: a Prospective Study
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Exploring the optimal range of blood pressure in elderly sepsis patients: a retrospective cohort study based on MIMIC-IV data.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Observational Examination of Cerebral Perfusion Changes in Patients Diagnosed with Sepsis Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography.Tanaffos · 2025Article
- PPI-based screening of hub genes related to sepsis migration/pyroptosis and immune infiltration analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSeptic shock, a life-threatening condition, can result in cerebral dysfunction and heightened mortality rates. In these patients, disturbances in cerebral hemodynamics, as reflected by impairment of myogenic cerebral autoregulation (CA), metabolic regulation, expressed by critical closing pressure (CrCP) and reductions in intracranial compliance (ICC), can adversely impact septic shock outcomes. The general recommendation is to maintain a target mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg but the effect of different MAP targets on cerebral hemodynamics in these patients is not clear and optimal targets might be dependent on the status of CA. This protocol aims to assess the cerebral hemodynamics profile at different pressure targets in septic shock patients.
methodsProspective, non-randomized, single-center trial, which will study cerebral hemodynamics in patients with septic shock within 48 hours of its onset. Patients will be studied at their baseline MAP and at three MAP targets (T1: 65, T2: 75, T3: 85 mmHg). Cerebral hemodynamics will be assessed by transcranial Doppler (TCD) and a skull micro-deformation sensor (B4C). Dynamic CA will be expressed by the autoregulation index (ARI), calculated by transfer function analysis, using fluctuations of MAP as input and corresponding oscillations in cerebral blood velocity (CBv). The instantaneous relationship between arterial blood pressure and CBv will be used to estimate CrCP and resistance-area product (RAP) for each cardiac cycle using the first harmonic method. The B4C will access ICC by intracranial pressure waveforms (P2/P1). The primary aim is to assess cerebral hemodynamics (ARI, CrCP, RAP, and P2/P1) at different targets of MAP in septic shock patients. Our secondary objective is to assess cerebral hemodynamics at 65mmHg (target recommended by guidelines). In addition, we will assess the correlation between markers of organ dysfunction (such as lactate levels, vasoactive drugs usage, SOFA score, and delirium) and CA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this study may help to understand the effect of the recommended MAP and variations in blood pressure in patients with septic shock and impaired CA and ICC. Furthermore, the results can assist large trials in establishing new hypotheses about neurological management in this group of patients. Approval was obtained from the local Ethics Committee (28134720.1.0000.0048). It is anticipated that the results of this study will be presented at national and international conferences and will be published in peer-reviewed journals in 2024 and 2025.
trial registrationTrial registration number: NCT05833607. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05833607.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.