Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39401207›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Korean Triage and Acuity Scale education using role-playing and its effects on triage competency: A quasi-experimental design.

Yon Hee Seo, Sun-Og Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yon Hee SeoDepartment of Nursing Science, Andong National University Andong-si, Andong-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea.
Sun-Og LimDepartment of Nursing, Shinsung University, Dangjin-si, Chungcheongnam-do, South Korea.ORCID 0009-0002-1741-6937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triage is the process of prioritizing patients in the emergency department (ED). This has a pivotal role in ensuring patient safety and that the ED operates smoothly; therefore, triage training education is an important aspect of triage nurses' preparedness in different emergency situations. This study employed a quasi-experimental research design using a non-equivalent control group pre-post-test design to verify the effect of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) education using role-playing on the knowledge of triage, triage performance ability, and triage competency in nursing students. Participants were 78 fourth-year nursing students from Shinseong University in South Korea; 39 were assigned to the experimental group, and 39 to the control group. The intervention was conducted for three weeks, from January 31 to February 16, 2024. The experimental group received KTAS education through role-playing, whereas the control group received triage education through lectures. Triage knowledge (t = 2.94, p = .004) and triage performance ability (t = 3.11, p = .003) were significantly improved in the experimental group. However, there was no significant difference in triage competency between groups (t = 1.32, p = .192). The post-test score of triage record in the experimental group showed a significant improvement over time (t = 0.56, p < .001). This study demonstrated that KTAS education using role-playing was more effective in improving triage knowledge and performance ability than traditional lecture methods for nursing students. Triage education programs should be developed considering the effectiveness of various teaching methods.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceRole PlayingTriageAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleRepublic of KoreaStudents, NursingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39401207
PMCPMC11472923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.