Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39401143›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Long-range alternative splicing contributes to neoantigen specificity in glioblastoma.

Mingjun Ji, Qing Yu, Xin-Zhuang Yang, Xianhong Yu, Jiaxin Wang, Chunfu Xiao, Ni A An, Chuanhui Han, Chuan-Yun Li, Wanqiu Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mingjun JiState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Genomic Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.
Qing YuState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Genomic Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.
Xin-Zhuang YangCenter for Bioinformatics, National Infrastructures for Translational Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine and Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 9 Dongdan Santiao, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China.
Xianhong YuAcademic Department, Shanghai MobiDrop Co., Ltd., Room 308, Building 1, No. 351 Guoshoujing Road, Shanghai Free Trade Pilot Zone, Shanghai 200000, China.
Jiaxin WangState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Genomic Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.
Chunfu XiaoState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Genomic Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.
Ni A AnInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 West Beichen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.
Chuanhui HanSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, No. 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Chuan-Yun LiState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Genomic Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8008-8430
Wanqiu DingState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Genomic Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6650-8662

Funding

Chinese Institute for Brain Research 2020-NKX-XM-11National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFA0801801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in neoantigen research have accelerated the development of immunotherapies for cancers, such as glioblastoma (GBM). Neoantigens resulting from genomic mutations and dysregulated alternative splicing have been studied in GBM. However, these studies have primarily focused on annotated alternatively-spliced transcripts, leaving non-annotated transcripts largely unexplored. Circular ribonucleic acids (circRNAs), abnormally regulated in tumors, are correlated with the presence of non-annotated linear transcripts with exon skipping events. But the extent to which these linear transcripts truly exist and their functions in cancer immunotherapies remain unknown. Here, we found the ubiquitous co-occurrence of circRNA biogenesis and alternative splicing across various tumor types, resulting in large amounts of long-range alternatively-spliced transcripts (LRs). By comparing tumor and healthy tissues, we identified tumor-specific LRs more abundant in GBM than in normal tissues and other tumor types. This may be attributable to the upregulation of the protein quaking in GBM, which is reported to promote circRNA biogenesis. In total, we identified 1057 specific and recurrent LRs in GBM. Through in silico translation prediction and MS-based immunopeptidome analysis, 16 major histocompatibility complex class I-associated peptides were identified as potential immunotherapy targets in GBM. This study revealed long-range alternatively-spliced transcripts specifically upregulated in GBM may serve as recurrent, immunogenic tumor-specific antigens.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingAntigens, NeoplasmGlioblastomaBrain NeoplasmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansRNA, CircularAntigens, NeoplasmRNA, Circularalternative splicingcircRNAneoantigen

Identifiers

PMID39401143
PMCPMC11472750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.