ArticleReproduction & fertility2024
The landscape of assisted reproductive technology access in India.
Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of challenges and prospective recommendations of medically assisted reproductive technology in developing countries.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- A comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation of two aqueous progesterone 25 mg injections in healthy postmenopausal women under fasting conditions: An open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover bioequivalence study.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2026Trial
- Clinical efficacy and safety of two highly purified human menopausal gonadotropins in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.Reproduction & fertility · 2025Trial
- Regulatory and access challenges in sperm cryopreservation in India after the ART Act 2021.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Investigating Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to and Utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technology Among Infertile Couples in Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Barriers beyond biology: The socioeconomic and cultural determinants of infertility treatment-seeking behaviour - A systematic review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Review
- No Evidence of Temporal Decline in Semen Parameters Over 17 Years Among Men Who Underwent Fertility Evaluation from Indian Southern States.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically, infertility has been stigmatized in the Indian society, primarily due to societal norms that equate marriage with procreation. In twentieth century, India focused primarily on over-fertility in its family planning programs, with little attention given to the complexities of infertility. The introduction of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in the late 1970s made a global revolution, including in India, offering hope to infertile couples. Despite a significant rise in ART clinics offering a wide range of treatment options in the recent years, challenges remain, particularly regarding the affordability. In India, ART is typically dominated by the private sector as government support remains limited. Efforts to standardize ART practices, including the establishment of the National ART & Surrogacy Registry and ART act aim to regulate, improve outcomes and curb unethical practice. Despite these advancements, the high cost of treatment cycles and lack of insurance coverage limit many couples' ability to undergo fertility treatment. Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach, including policy reform, increased public awareness, and the development of affordable treatment options to ensure broader access to reproductive care across India.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.