Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39401131›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2024

Feasibility, Acceptability, Satisfaction, and Challenges of an mHealth App (e-ASCov) for Community-Based COVID-19 Screening by Community Health Workers in Rwanda: Mixed Methods Study.

Abdou Y Omorou, Pacifique Ndishimye, Bruno Hoen, Léon Mutesa, Prosper Karame, Ladislas Nshimiyimana, Simon Galmiche, Hassan Mugabo, Janvier Murayire, Muco Mugisha and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Abdou Y OmorouUMR 1319 INSPIIRE, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1135-0439
Pacifique NdishimyeLaboratory of Emerging and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3285-2622
Bruno HoenUMR 1319 INSPIIRE, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3070-3017
Léon MutesaCentre for Human Genetics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-5308-3706
Prosper KarameResearch, Innovation and Data Science Division, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Ladislas NshimiyimanaResearch, Innovation and Data Science Division, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-5551-6990
Simon GalmicheEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1691-1744
Hassan MugaboResearch, Innovation and Data Science Division, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Janvier MurayireDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Muco MugishaRinda Ubuzima, Kigali, Rwanda.
Marie Michele UmulisaRinda Ubuzima, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-2758-5681
Yvonne Delphine Nsaba UweraMidwifery Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Clarisse MusanagabanwaResearch, Innovation and Data Science Division, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Noella BigirimanaResearch, Innovation and Data Science Division, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Sabin NsanzimanaMinistry of Health Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-5946-0015
Francis GuilleminUMR 1319 INSPIIRE, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9860-7024
Jean Paul RwabihamaDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-7517-4991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although at the base of the pyramid-shaped organization of the Rwandan health system, community health workers (CHWs) are central to the community-based management of disease outbreaks. Objective: This mixed methods study aimed to explore the feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, and challenges of a mobile health (mHealth) tool for community-based COVID-19 screening in Rwanda. Methods: Two urban (Gasabo and Nyarugenge) and 2 rural (Rusizi and Kirehe) districts in Rwanda participated in the project (smartphone app for COVID-19 screening). A mixed methods approach was used to inform the feasibility (awareness and expectation), acceptability (use and perceived benefits), satisfaction, and challenges of the mHealth intervention. At the end of the project, CHWs were asked to complete a quantitative questionnaire on the use of and satisfaction with the app. Then, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were organized with CHWs. A content analysis was performed on the transcripts. Results: Overall, 383 CHWs were recruited and trained; 378 CHWs participated in the study. The mean age of CHWs was 36.7 (SD 6.6) to 45.3 (SD 9.9) years and most were women (237/378, 62.7%). More than 7000 people were registered with the use of the app and 20% were referred to a local COVID-19 testing facility. According to CHW reporting, the median number of people screened by each CHW ranged from 152 (IQR 70-276) for Nyarugenge to 24 (IQR 16-90) for Rusizi. COVID-19 positivity rates were higher in urban than rural districts: more than half of the CHWs in Gasabo reported a confirmed positive case versus only 2.4% for Kirehe and 15.4% for Rusizi. Despite the app being a novel tool, CHWs were well aware of the use of such a tool and had appropriate expectations. Acceptability and satisfaction were very high, with differences between urban and rural districts. Satisfaction was higher in Nyarugenge (72.8/100) and Gasabo (80.7/100) than in Kirehe (61.6/100) and Rusizi (64.5/100). More than 80% of the CHWs were willing to continue using the e-ASCov app, with the exception of CHWs in Kirehe (56.7%). The app was perceived as a tool to generate information on COVID-19, inform on the status of the pandemic, and help curb the spread of the pandemic in Rwanda. CHWs were satisfied with the app at all stages of its implementation in their districts. Conclusions: In this proof-of-concept study, a smartphone app for screening COVID-19 was useful as an mHealth tool to be used by CHWs, with the potential to increase health system efficiency in an epidemic context. The context should be analyzed for generalization on a country-wide scale, both in case of an epidemic and to take into account certain conditions at the community level. Information is needed on the conditions of generalization and transferability of this type of app to other health conditions so that CHWs can be given their full place in a pyramidal health system.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersCOVID-19Feasibility StudiesMass ScreeningMobile ApplicationsAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchRwandaSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineacceptabilityAfricaappsbarrierschallengescommunity basedcommunity health workersCOVID-19COVID-19 screeningCOVID-19 screening toolfeasibilityLMICmHealthmobile healthproof-of-conceptSARS-CoV-2satisfactionscreeningsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID39401131
PMCPMC11493106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.