Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39401095›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2025

An efficient CRISPR-Cas12a-mediated MicroRNA knockout strategy in plants.

Xuelian Zheng, Xu Tang, Yuechao Wu, Xiaoqin Zheng, Jianping Zhou, Qinqin Han, Yalan Tang, Xinxuan Fu, Jiao Deng, Yibo Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Regulatory Landscapes of Non-Coding RNAs During Drought Stress in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xuelian Zheng *Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (Chongqing) Science City, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tree Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Xu Tang *Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (Chongqing) Science City, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tree Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Yuechao Wu *Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Molecular Breeding/Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory/Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics of the Ministry of Education, Agricultural College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Xiaoqin Zheng *Key Laboratory of Coarse Cereal Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Sichuan Engineering and Technology Research Center of Coarse Cereal Industrialization, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Jianping ZhouDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Qinqin HanDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yalan TangDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xinxuan FuDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jiao DengIntegrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (Chongqing) Science City, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tree Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Yibo WangIntegrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (Chongqing) Science City, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tree Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Danning WangIntegrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (Chongqing) Science City, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tree Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Shuting ZhangDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Tao ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Molecular Breeding/Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory/Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics of the Ministry of Education, Agricultural College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7897-0205
Yiping QiDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-6706
Yong ZhangIntegrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (Chongqing) Science City, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tree Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3704-4835

Funding

the Biological Breeding-Major Projects 2023ZD04058the Biological Breeding-Major Projects 2023ZD04076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease has been used to knock out MicroRNA (miRNA) genes in plants, greatly promoting the study of miRNA function. However, due to its propensity for generating small insertions and deletions, Cas9 is not well-suited for achieving a complete knockout of miRNA genes. By contrast, CRISPR-Cas12a nuclease generates larger deletions, which could significantly disrupt the secondary structure of pre-miRNA and prevent the production of mature miRNAs. Through the case study of OsMIR390 in rice, we confirmed that Cas12a is a more efficient tool than Cas9 in generating knockout mutants of a miRNA gene. To further demonstrate CRISPR-Cas12a-mediated knockout of miRNA genes in rice, we targeted nine OsMIRNA genes that have different spaciotemporal expression and have not been previously investigated via genetic knockout approaches. With CRISPR-Cas12a, up to 100% genome editing efficiency was observed at these miRNA loci. The resulting larger deletions suggest Cas12a robustly generated null alleles of miRNA genes. Transcriptome profiling of the miRNA mutants, as well as phenotypic analysis of the rice grains revealed the function of these miRNAs in controlling gene expression and regulating grain quality and seed development. This study established CRISPR-Cas12a as an efficient tool for genetic knockout of miRNA genes in plants.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGene Knockout TechniquesMicroRNAsOryzaRNA, PlantMicroRNAsRNA, PlantCRISPR‐Cas12agenome Editinggermplasm innovationMicroRNArice

Identifiers

PMID39401095
PMCPMC11672732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.