ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Cancer Worry and Fatalism at the Intersection of Race and Hearing Status.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationship between health literacy, health fatalism and attitudes towards cancer screenings: latent profile analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) community experiences lower cancer screening rates than the general population. Cancer worry and fatalism can influence cancer screening, along with race, and the interaction of intrinsic factors with DHH health behavior needs to be investigated.
objectivesThe study examines the association of the intersection of race and hearing status with cancer worry and fatalism.
methodsThis study analyzed cross-sectional survey data from NCI HINTS-ASL (for DHH adults) and NCI HINTS (for hearing adults). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess (i) the association of race-hearing status intersection with cancer worry and fatalism, as well as (ii) the relationship between hearing status and outcomes within each race.
resultsThe study found that the overall interaction between race and hearing status was significantly associated with both high cancer worry and fatalism, with African American (AA)/Black and Asian/Other having higher odds of worry [1.17 (0.83, 1.64); 1.19 (0.85, 1.66), respectively] and other groups having lower worry than White hearing (
conclusionDHH individuals have different odds of experiencing cancer worry and fatalism compared to their hearing counterparts. Inclusion of individuals with sensory disabilities in a larger cancer study sample enriches the diversity of perspectives, ensuring that the findings reflect a broader range of experiences and needs. More research into contributory factors in the signing DHH population is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.