ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2024
Enteric Pathogen Detection Using Multiplex PCR Assay in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Diarrhea-Retrospective Before-After Study.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostical Performances of the FilmArray Gastro-Intestinal Panel in Kidney Transplant Recipients.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiarrhea is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation, however the etiology is often not identified. Multiplex PCR assays may increase the detection of diarrheal pathogens among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), leading to improved management.
methodsThis was a retrospective before-after study, conducted in a high-volume transplant center. In September 2017, multiplex PCR assay was introduced. We reviewed all hospitalized KTRs with diarrhea during 1/2015-8/2017 (pre-GI PCR, n = 111) and 9/2017-12/2021 (GI PCR, n = 159) and followed them for 3 years. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis for predictors of pathogen identification, introducing the study period as an independent variable.
resultsAmong 270 hospitalized KTRs with diarrhea, 64 (24%) had an identified diarrheal pathogen. The proportion of KTRs with an identified pathogen increased from 20% (13/64) in the pre-GI PCR to 80% (51/64) post GI PCR (p < 0.01). Of 51 KTRs with an identified pathogen in the post GI PCR, 44 (86%) were diagnosed using GI PCR. GI PCR was more likely used in younger KTRs with more recent transplantation and higher creatinine level at admission. The most common non-C. difficile diarrheal pathogens in the post-GI PCR cohort were enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (n = 23, 58%), norovirus (n = 11, 28%), and Campylobacter (n = 11, 28%). Implementing GI PCR significantly increased the detection and identification of GI pathogens (odds ratio [OR] = 21, CI 95% 10-44; p < 0.001).
conclusionsInfectious etiologies of diarrhea were identified in a higher proportion of KTRs after the implementation of GI PCR. This emphasizes the importance of integrating this diagnostic tool into diarrhea workup in KTRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.