Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39400900›Full record

ReviewDoklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections2024

The Systematics and Phylogeny of Myxomycetes: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow.

E L Moroz, V I Gmoshinskiy, O N Shchepin, Yu K Novozhilov

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E L MorozKuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072, Minsk, Republic of Belarus. moroze.l@tut.by.
V I GmoshinskiyMoscow State University, 119234, Moscow, Russia. rubisco@list.ru.
O N ShchepinKomarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 197376, St. Petersburg, Russia. oshchepin@binran.ru.
Yu K NovozhilovKomarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 197376, St. Petersburg, Russia. yurynovozh1lov@yandex.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myxomycetes are amoeboid fungus-like organisms (Amoebozoa) with a unique life cycle characterized by a great morphological diversity of fruiting bodies. Due to the similarity of these structures to the fruiting bodies of some representatives of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, myxomycetes have been classified as fungi since the first known scientific description in 1654. Only in the 19th century, when their life cycle was studied, did the difference of this group from fungi become clear. During the same period, microscopic structures of fruiting bodies, as well as ornamentation of the spore surface, began to be considered as diagnostic features. Due to this, in the period from the end of the 19th to the middle of the 20th century, a rather stable system was formed. However, as further studies have shown, both macro- and micromorphological characters are often quite variable, depend on environmental conditions, and often result from convergent evolution, which causes difficulties in defining species and taxonomic units of higher ranks. Since the first decade of the 21st century, due to the development of molecular genetic methods and the accumulation of data on nucleotide sequences of marker genes together with the improvement of microscopic studies, it has been possible to obtain data on the evolutionary relationships of different groups of myxomycetes. A milestone in this process was the publication of the first phylogenetic system of myxomycetes in 2019. This work was the starting point for a number of studies on the relationships between different groups of myxomycetes at a lower taxonomic level. Thus, there has been a surge in the number of studies that bring us closer to constructing a natural system.

Indexed as

MyxomycetesPhylogenyAmoebozoahistory of mycologymarker genesmorphologytaxonomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.