Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39400894›Full record

ArticleDoklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections2024

Influence of Storage Methods on the Vitality and Growth Rate of Macrofungi.

N S Komissarov, M Yu Dyakov, L V Garibova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N S KomissarovMoscow State University, Moscow, Russia. macoloams@gmail.com.
M Yu DyakovMoscow State University, Moscow, Russia. max_fungi@mail.ru.
L V GaribovaMoscow State University, Moscow, Russia. gariblv@yandex.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The work contains a comparative analysis of methods for storing pure cultures of macrofungi. The study used 20 species of macrofungi from various taxonomic and ecological-trophic groups. Storage was carried out using five methods: serial subculturing, storage under a layer of distilled water and three cryopreservation protocols: a protocol using blocks of agar medium, a "perlite protocol," and a "grain protocol." For the selected cryostorage methods, various cryoprotective compounds (glycerol, trehalose) were used. Radial growth rate was used as a criterion for the state of crops. The values of the radial growth rate obtained immediately after isolation of the pure culture were chosen as the control. It has been shown that the most favorable for preserving the physiological activity of cultures are the storage method under a layer of distilled water, "perlite" and "grain" cryopreservation protocols.

Indexed as

CryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsCryoprotective Agentsbiotechnologycryostoragemushroom growingphysiological activity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.