ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024
Augmenting Blood Test and Periodontal Examination Data with Generative Adversarial Networks for Enhanced Dementia Risk Prediction.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of data augmentation to improve dementia risk prediction using deep neural networks (DNNs). Previous research has shown that basic blood test data were cost-effective and crucial in predicting cognitive function, as indicated by mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores. However, creating models that can accommodate various conditions is a significant challenge due to constraints related to blood test and MMSE results, such as high costs, limited sample size, and missing data from specific tests not conducted in certain facilities. Periodontal examinations have also emerged as a cost-effective tool for mass screening. To address these issues, this study explores the use of generative adversarial networks (GANs) for generating synthesised data from blood test and periodontal examination results. We used DNNs with four hidden layers to compare prediction accuracy between real and GAN-synthesised data from 108 participants at Nihon University Itabashi Hospital. The GAN-synthesised DNNs achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.91 ± 0.30 compared to 2.04 ± 0.37 for real data, indicating improved accuracy with synthesised data. Importantly, synthesised data showcased enhanced robustness against missing important variables including age information, and better managed data imbalances. Considering the difficulties in amassing extensive medical data, the augmentation approach is promising in refining dementia risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39400826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.