ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024
Evaluation of the Relationship Between Pulmonary Perfusion Via Chest Digital Dynamic Radiography System and Diffusing Capacity Test.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive, visual, and quantitative in vivo evaluation of pulmonary blood flow is helpful in assessing gas exchange at the alveolar level. A chest digital dynamic radiography system (CDDR) has the potential to visually and quantitatively express pulmonary haemodynamics using temporal changes in radiographic transparency synchronised with the heartbeat. The lung-diffusing capacity (DLCO) test involves membranous factors comprising the alveolar membrane, interstitium, and vascular walls. Additionally, DLCO includes pulmonary blood flow factors defined by pulmonary capillary blood flow and haemoglobin levels. In individuals lacking an alveolar septum, interstitial abnormalities or anaemia leading to changes in DLCO may reflect changes in the pulmonary blood flow. Here, we investigated the usefulness of CDDR in evaluating pulmonary blood flow by comparing it with DLCO.For pulmonary blood flow, we extracted and visualised signal changes in the lung field synchronised with heart rate during CDDR imaging and created a maximum intensity projection (MIP). The DLCO was measured using the single-breath method. Among the patients who underwent CDDR, 10 with FEV/FVC (FEV1.0%) > 70% and 16 with COPD (FEV1.0% < 70%) without noticeable interstitial changes were included, with a cutoff = 70%/predicted value. MIP was compared as a pulmonary blood flow evaluation method in the DLCO≥70% group (control group: n = 15) and the DLCO<70% group (decreased DLCO group: n = 11). The mean and median values of MIP in the reduced group were lower than those in the control group (p < 0.05).Pulmonary blood flow evaluated using CDDR may be able to assess pulmonary circulatory disturbances visually and quantitatively, as indicated by decreased pulmonary diffusion capacity in patients with negligible pulmonary interstitial changes and anaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39400817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.