Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39400767›Full record

ArticleDoklady. Biochemistry and biophysics2024

Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus Activate the CG45045 Gene in Drosophila S2 Cell Line.

Yu A Polunina, A E Pravednikova, M Ghassah, P G Georgiev, Yu V Shidlovskii, Z M Kachaev

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu A PoluninaInstitute of Gene Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
A E PravednikovaInstitute of Gene Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
M GhassahInstitute of Gene Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
P G GeorgievInstitute of Gene Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Yu V ShidlovskiiInstitute of Gene Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Z M KachaevInstitute of Gene Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. k-z-m@mail.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The humoral immune system of Drosophila melanogaster, which is the best studied of all eukaryotes, is activated by the canonical IMD and Toll signalling pathways. Recently, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and genes encoding short polypeptides have been identified as potential regulators of the innate immune response. S2 cells are a macrophage-like cell line. They are used as a model system to study the molecular mechanisms of immune response gene activation. We used this cell line to study the effect of Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus bacteria on the transcription of the lncRNA-CR30055 and the CG45045 and CG44404 genes, encoding short polypeptides. We found that pathogens activate only CG45045, while the transcription levels of CR30055 and CG44404 remain unchanged. No activation of Cecropin C and some Bomanin family genes was observed, suggesting differing patterns of immune response gene activation in S2 cells and adult flies. The highest activation of CG45045 was observed between 6 and 12 hours of cell incubation with pathogens. The activation patterns of CG45045 after exposure to E. coli and M. luteus were similar, suggesting common mechanisms of transcriptional activation of this gene. Thus, CG45045 may be a novel gene involved in the humoral immune response of Drosophila.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEscherichia coliMicrococcus luteusAnimalsCell LineDrosophila ProteinsIMDinnate immunitylncRNApolypeptideToll

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.