Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39400705›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2024

Limited gut bacterial response of tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) to dietary manipulation and captivity.

Carmen Hoffbeck, Danielle R M L Middleton, Susan N Keall, Chye-Mei Huang, An Pas, Kate Irving, Nicola J Nelson, Michael W Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carmen HoffbeckSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0685-8505
Danielle R M L MiddletonManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln7608, New Zealand.
Susan N KeallSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand.
Chye-Mei HuangAuckland Zoo, Auckland 1022, New Zealand.
An PasAuckland Zoo, Auckland 1022, New Zealand.
Kate IrvingWellington Zoo, Wellington 6021, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-1629
Nicola J NelsonSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand.
Michael W TaylorSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.

Funding

Auckland ZooMinistry of Business, Innovation and Employment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacteria of a host's digestive tract play crucial roles in digestion and pathogen resistance. Hosts living in captivity often have more human interaction and antibiotic use, in addition to differences in diet and environment, compared to their wild counterparts. Consequently, wild and captive animals frequently harbour different bacterial communities. We tested whether diversity of diet provided in captivity shifts the gut bacteria of tuatara, an endemic New Zealand reptile, at three captive sites, and examined how the gut community of these tuatara compares to those in the wild. Dietary manipulation did not cause a strong overall shift in tuatara gut bacteria, but individual tuatara did experience bacterial shifts during manipulation, which subsequently reverted after manipulation. We found that Bacteroides, a genus common in most vertebrate guts but rare in tuatara, increased significantly in the gut during manipulation, then decreased post-manipulation. Finally, the gut bacteria of captive tuatara significantly differed from those of wild tuatara, though most of the dominant bacterial genera found in wild tuatara persisted in captive tuatara. This work represents a first investigation of the captive tuatara bacterial community and establishes the sensitivity of the gut community to dietary manipulation and captivity for this relict reptile.

Indexed as

BacteriaDietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeReptilesAnimalsAnimals, WildAnimals, ZooNew ZealandRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbacterial communitycaptivitydietreptile

Identifiers

PMID39400705
PMCPMC11523620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.