GuidelineMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2024
Consensus statement on non-cancer-related risk factors for development of secondary lymphedema.
Guideline in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural History of Subclinical Lower Limb Lymphedema After Gynecologic Cancer Surgery Using Indocyanine Green Lymphography.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Radiation induces senescence in lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) and murine tail lymphedema tissue, contributing to lymphedema progression.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Saturated fatty acids induce lipotoxicity in lymphatic endothelial cells contributing to secondary lymphedema development.EMBO molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Advancing Lymphedema Surveillance With Evidence-Based Practices.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-cancer-related risk factors for secondary lymphedema were defined across four categories: co-morbidity, social determinants of health, behavioral factors, and environmental effectors. Based on rapid reviews of the literature and presentations at the ACS/LANA Lymphedema Summit, this working group categorized these risk factors according to the strength of evidence. Consensus agreement on level of evidence was achieved through one face-to-face working session and three follow-up virtual meetings. Findings elucidate strong evidence for co-morbidities, such as cardio/metabolic and vascular factors contributing to the risk for lymphedema. Evidence is low-to-moderate for social and behavioral factors and is lacking for environmental factors. Panel recommendations suggest a tailored approach to prospective surveillance when monitoring for secondary lymphedema that includes social determinants of health considering the growing awareness and evidence of these factors' influence on cancer and cancer-related morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39400667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.