Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39400658›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2025

Why dogs prefer zoomies to zoom and what it tells us about the importance of in-person meetings for learning and memory.

Géraldine Coppin, Michael L Onofrio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Géraldine CoppinDepartment of Psychology, UniDistance Suisse, Schinerstrasse 18, 3900, Brigue, Switzerland. geraldine.coppin@unidistance.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7848-3298
Michael L OnofrioTillster, Inc., 5959 Cornerstone Court West #100, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2719-9002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As people commonly observe dog behaviors like the sudden bursts of physical movement colloquially known as "zoomies," and the canine penchant for sticking their nose out of car windows and for sniffing intently in dog parks, it is not surprising that people generally believe dogs learn and communicate by smell. While people generally discount their own olfactory sensitivity and the importance of smell overall, humans also learn and communicate by smell, in some cases even better than dogs. In this article, we discuss why this information exchange matters for learning and memory and why virtual meetings don't pass the sniff test.

Indexed as

LearningMemoryOlfactory PerceptionSmellAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDogsHumansBody odorsChemosensory communicationIn-person meetingsLearningOnline meetings

Identifiers

PMID39400658
PMCPMC11897111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.