Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39400616›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024

3D ultrasound guidance for radiofrequency ablation in an anthropomorphic thyroid nodule phantom.

Tim Boers, Sicco J Braak, Wyger M Brink, Michel Versluis, Srirang Manohar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tim BoersMulti-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. t.boers@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-1941
Sicco J BraakDepartment of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands.
Wyger M BrinkMagnetic Detection and Imaging group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9974-7662
Michel VersluisPhysics of Fluids group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-1860
Srirang ManoharMulti-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2986-6671

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 116310008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound for guiding radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of benign thyroid nodules presents limitations, including the inability to monitor the entire treatment volume and operator dependency in electrode positioning. We compared three-dimensional (3D)-guided RFA using a matrix ultrasound transducer with conventional 2D-ultrasound guidance in an anthropomorphic thyroid nodule phantom incorporated additionally with temperature-sensitive albumin.

methodsTwenty-four phantoms with 48 nodules were constructed and ablated by an experienced radiologist using either 2D- or 3D-ultrasound guidance. Postablation T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired to determine the final ablation temperature distribution in the phantoms. These were used to analyze ablation parameters, such as the nodule ablation percentage. Further, additional procedure parameters, such as dominant/non-dominant hand use, were recorded.

resultsNonsignificant trends towards lower ablated volumes for both within (74.4 ± 9.1% (median ± interquartile range) versus 78.8 ± 11.8%) and outside of the nodule (0.35 ± 0.18 mL versus 0.45 ± 0.46 mL), along with lower variances in performance, were noted for the 3D-guided ablation. For the total ablation percentage, 2D-guided dominant hand ablation performed better than 2D-guided non-dominant hand ablation (81.0% versus 73.2%, p = 0.045), while there was no significant effect in the hand comparison for 3D-guided ablation.

conclusion3D-ultrasound-guided RFA showed no significantly different results compared to 2D guidance, while 3D ultrasound showed a reduced variance in RFA. A significant reduction in operator-ablating hand dependence was observed when using 3D guidance. Further research into the use of 3D ultrasound for RFA is warranted. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Using 3D ultrasound for thyroid nodule RFA could improve the clinical outcome. A platform that creates 3D data could be used for thyroid diagnosis, therapy planning, and navigational tools. KEY POINTS: Twenty-four in-house-developed thyroid nodule phantoms with 48 nodules were constructed. RFA was performed under 2D- or 3D-ultrasound guidance. 3D- and 2D ultrasound-guided RFAs showed comparable performance. Real-time dual-plane imaging may offer an improved overview of the ablation zone and aid electrode positioning. Dominant and non-dominant hand 3D-ultrasound-guided RFA outcomes were comparable.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalPhantoms, ImagingRadiofrequency AblationThyroid NoduleUltrasonography, InterventionalHumansImaging (three-dimensional)Phantoms (imaging)Radiofrequency ablationThyroid noduleUltrasonography (interventional)

Identifiers

PMID39400616
PMCPMC11473505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.