ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2025
The New Era of Total Neoadjuvant FLOT Therapy for Locally Advanced, Resectable Gastric Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Comparison With Standard Perioperative Therapy.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Perioperative versus adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and feasibility of total neoadjuvant FLOT chemotherapy in locally-advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Pretreatment C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index predicts survival in patients with FLOT-treated locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT 4 + 4) versus total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT; FLOT ×8) for resectable gastric cancer: A systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.Surgery open science · 2026Review
- The role of GP73 in predicting overall survival and chemotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Predicting the Unpredictable: Prognostic Role of Systemic Inflammatory Indices and Tumor Biology of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer-Insights from a Systematic Review and Real-World Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Gastric cancer and the TNT era: have we solved the timing question, or only redistributed the treatment?Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Is More Really Better? Intensive Neoadjuvant Therapy and Standard Perioperative FLOT for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Demonstrate Similar Short-Term Outcomes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe FLOT 4-AIO trial established the docetaxel-based regimen's superiority over epirubicin-based triplet therapy in terms of survival rates and acceptable toxicity for locally advanced resectable gastric (LARGC). Yet, fewer than half of the patients achieved completion of eight prescribed FLOT cycles. We proposed that administering all FLOT cycles in the form of total neoadjuvant therapy may improve completion rates and downstaging. This study contrasted total neoadjuvant therapy (FLOT x8) with standard neoadjuvant therapy (FLOT 4+4) for patients LARGC adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection with routine D2 lymphadenectomy, focusing on histopathological outcomes, toxicity, and survival outcomes.
methodsWe reviewed patients with histologically confirmed advanced clinical stage cT2 or higher, nodal positive stage (cN+), or both, with resectable gastric tumors and no distant metastases (January 2017 to July 2023). We divided patients into two groups, FLOT 4+4 and FLOT x8; FLOT 4+4 patients underwent four preoperative and four postoperative bi-weekly cycles of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil, while FLOT x8 patients received all eight cycles preoperatively after a gradual practice change starting from January 2020. Propensity score matching adjusted for age, clinical stage, tumor location, and histology.
resultsOf the 77 patients in the FLOT x8 group, 37 were propensity-matched to an equal number in the FLOT 4+4 group. Demographics, duration of surgery, and hospital stay showed no significant differences between the groups. The FLOT x8 group exhibited a significantly higher all-cycle completion rate at 89.1% compared to FLOT 4+4's 67.6% (p < 0.01). Both groups demonstrated comparable hematological and non-hematological toxicity rates, Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complications, and CAP tumor regression grades. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 42.5 and 41.2 in the FLOT 4+4 and FLOT x8 groups, respectively. Similar rates of disease-free survival and overall survival were noted in both groups, despite a trend toward a higher pathological complete response rate, albeit not statistically significant (8.1% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.29), in the FLOT x8 group at a median follow-up of 36 months.
conclusionTotal neoadjuvant therapy with the FLOT x8 protocol corresponds to higher treatment completion rates, a safety profile similar to standard perioperative therapy, and a twofold increase in complete pathological response. Further research on long-term oncological outcomes is needed to confirm the effectiveness of total neoadjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.