ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Deep coupled registration and segmentation of multimodal whole-brain images.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodality Multimask and Multitask Auto-Segmentation Network for Organs-at-Risk in Head and Neck Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Automated segmentation of neurons and spinal cord structures in immunofluorescence images using SpineDL.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High-Resolution Leaf Image Sequences with Geometric Alignment for Dynamic Phenotyping of Foliar Diseases.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRecent brain mapping efforts are producing large-scale whole-brain images using different imaging modalities. Accurate alignment and delineation of anatomical structures in these images are essential for numerous studies. These requirements are typically modeled as two distinct tasks: registration and segmentation. However, prevailing methods, fail to fully explore and utilize the inherent correlation and complementarity between the two tasks. Furthermore, variations in brain anatomy, brightness, and texture pose another formidable challenge in designing multi-modal similarity metrics. A high-throughput approach capable of overcoming the bottleneck of multi-modal similarity metric design, while effective leveraging the highly correlated and complementary nature of two tasks is highly desirable.
resultsWe introduce a deep learning framework for joint registration and segmentation of multi-modal brain images. Under this framework, registration and segmentation tasks are deeply coupled and collaborated at two hierarchical layers. In the inner layer, we establish a strong feature-level coupling between the two tasks by learning a unified common latent feature representation. In the outer layer, we introduce a mutually supervised dual-branch network to decouple latent features and facilitate task-level collaboration between registration and segmentation. Since the latent features we designed are also modality-independent, the bottleneck of designing multi-modal similarity metric is essentially addressed. Another merit offered by this framework is the interpretability of latent features, which allows intuitive manipulation of feature learning, thereby further enhancing network training efficiency and the performance of both tasks. Extensive experiments conducted on both multi-modal and mono-modal datasets of mouse and human brains demonstrate the superiority of our method. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code is available at https://github.com/tingtingup/DCRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.