Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39400051›Full record

ArticleVeterinary pathology2025

Artificial intelligence-based quantification of lymphocytes in feline small intestinal biopsies.

Judit M Wulcan, Paula R Giaretta, Sai Fingerhood, Simone de Brot, Esther E V Crouch, Tatiana Wolf, Maria Isabel Casanova, Pedro R Ruivo, Pompei Bolfa, Nicolás Streitenberger and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhancing dromedary camel (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Judit M WulcanUniversity of California, Davis, Davis, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0624-9611
Paula R GiarettaTexas A&M University, College Station, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-2261-281X
Sai FingerhoodUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1588-0672
Simone de BrotUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-0103
Esther E V CrouchCharles River Laboratories International, Inc, Wilmington, MA.
Tatiana WolfVDx Veterinary Diagnostics, Davis, CA.
Maria Isabel CasanovaUniversity of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Pedro R RuivoUniversity of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Pompei BolfaRoss University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-1535
Nicolás StreitenbergerCalifornia Animal Health & Food Safety Laboratory System, Davis, CA.
Christof A BertramUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Wien, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2402-9997
Taryn A DonovanSchwarzman Animal Medical Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-5740-9550
Michael Kevin KeelUniversity of California, Davis, Davis, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0995-1617
Peter F MooreUniversity of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Stefan M KellerUniversity of California, Davis, Davis, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-5428-2985

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feline chronic enteropathy is a poorly defined condition of older cats that encompasses chronic enteritis to low-grade intestinal lymphoma. The histological evaluation of lymphocyte numbers and distribution in small intestinal biopsies is crucial for classification and grading. However, conventional histological methods for lymphocyte quantification have low interobserver agreement, resulting in low diagnostic reliability. This study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) model to detect intraepithelial and lamina propria lymphocytes in hematoxylin and eosin-stained small intestinal biopsies from cats. The median sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1 score of the AI model compared with the majority opinion of 11 veterinary anatomic pathologists, were 100% (interquartile range [IQR] 67%-100%), 57% (IQR 38%-83%), and 67% (IQR 43%-80%) for intraepithelial lymphocytes, and 89% (IQR 71%-100%), 67% (IQR 50%-82%), and 70% (IQR 43%-80%) for lamina propria lymphocytes, respectively. Errors included false negatives in whole-slide images with faded stain and false positives in misidentifying enterocyte nuclei. Semiquantitative grading at the whole-slide level showed low interobserver agreement among pathologists, underscoring the need for a reproducible quantitative approach. While semiquantitative grade and AI-derived lymphocyte counts correlated positively, the AI-derived lymphocyte counts overlapped between different grades. Our AI model, when supervised by a pathologist, offers a reproducible, objective, and quantitative assessment of feline intestinal lymphocytes at the whole-slide level, and has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency for feline chronic enteropathy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCat DiseasesIntestine, SmallLymphocytesAnimalsBiopsyCatsLymphocyte CountReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificitycatcomputer visiondeep learningfeline chronic enteropathygastrointestinalimage analysislymphoplasmacytic enteritissmall cell lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID39400051
PMCPMC11874495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.