Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39400009›Full record

ArticleAnales del sistema sanitario de Navarra2024

Fruit and vegetables loss and waste in preschools belonging to the National Board of Kindergartens of Chile.

Ximena Rodríguez Palleres, Claudio Villota Arcos, Álvaro Toledo San Martín, Fancy Rojas González, Juan Manuel Castagnini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. School Lunches in Poland-Planned Wastage.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ximena Rodríguez PalleresUniversidad de Valencia. Facultad de Farmacia. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Ciencias de la Alimentación, Toxicología y Medicina Forense. Grupo de Investigación en Tecnologías Innovadoras para una Alimentación Sostenible (ALISOST). Universidad de Valencia. Valencia. España.
Claudio Villota ArcosBernardo O'Higgins University. Faculty of Health Sciences. School of Nutrition and Dietetics. Santiago. Chile.. claudio.villota@ubo.cl.
Álvaro Toledo San MartínBernardo O'Higgins University. Faculty of Engineering, Science and Technology. Department of Mathematics and Engineering Sciences. Santiago. Chile.. alvaro.toledo@ubo.cl.
Fancy Rojas GonzálezBernardo O'Higgins University. Department of Transfer, Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Santiago. Chile.. fancy.rojas@ubo.cl.
Juan Manuel CastagniniUniversidad de Valencia. Facultad de Farmacia. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Ciencias de la Alimentación, Toxicología y Medicina Forense. Grupo de Investigación en Tecnologías Innovadoras para una Alimentación Sostenible (ALISOST). Universidad de Valencia. Valencia. España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood waste is a global issue affecting society from environmental, nutritional, and social perspectives. In collaboration with the National Board of Preschools, fruit and vegetable waste generated during the preparation of lunch was quantified in four preschools in the Metropolitan area of Santiago in Chile.

methodsThis study was conducted in four preschools, two in the Western area of Santiago and two in the Eastern area, of which two hold environmental quality certifications. Over a five-day period, the weight of raw materials and waste from vegetables (peels) and fruit (pomace) were measured. Percentages of vegetable and fruit post-cleaning losses and waste were evaluated.

resultsVegetable loss exceeded 20% in 31% of the preschools, primarily from carrots and potatoes. Fruit losses were higher, with pears accounting for the most significant waste, recorded in 75% of the study centers. No differences in vegetable loss was found between centers, while variations were observed for fruit. Preschools with environmental quality certifications wasted less onions (p = 0.016) but more pears (p = 0.036).

conclusionsThere is higher fruit loss than vegetable loss, with onions and tomatoes being the least wasted. Possessing an environmental quality certification does not guarantee a significant reduction in overall losses. Handling and storage conditions may play a key role in minimizing losses. Further studies are needed to provide evidence that can guide improvements in Chile's National Board of Preschools services, aiming for a more sustainable lunch preparation processes.

Indexed as

FruitVegetablesChild, PreschoolChileHumansSchools

Identifiers

PMID39400009
PMCPMC11673439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.