ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Effect of Surface Treatments Applied to 3D Printed Permanent Resins on Shear Bond Strength.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of surface treatment protocols and thermocycling on the optical, surface, and mechanical properties of additively manufactured resin materials.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Effect of modified glaze application protocols on color stability of 3D-printed permanent dental resins.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Influence of surface treatment and cement type on the bond strength of additively manufactured permanent resin materials.Odontology · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional-printed endocrowns: Does increasing intracoronal depth improve strength at the expense of fracture severity?Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Do the Pre-Existing Class III and Class V Composite Restorations Affect the Sealing Ability and Integrity of 3D-Printed Laminate Veneer Margins? An In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Surface pretreatment and cement influence on bond strength of three-dimensional printed permanent restorations.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Surface pretreatments and erosive aging effects on the bond strength of CAD/CAM resin-based materials with a self-adhesive resin cement.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Influence of surface pretreatments on the repair bond strength of 3D-printed resin used for permanent restorations: anFrontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative effects of plasma activation and monomer infiltration on the surface characteristics and wettability of 3D-printed permanent crown resin.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Repair bond strength of composite resin to additively manufactured permanent resin materials: a comparative evaluation of light-cure, self-cure, and dual-cure universal adhesives.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Bonding Orthodontic Attachments to 3D-Printed Photosensitive Definitive Resin: An In Vitro Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Chairside Reline Materials to 3D Printed Provisional Crown Resins Following Surface Treatment.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Optical properties of repaired additively manufactured resin composites and zirconia and subtractively manufactured ceramics: a comparative study of composite resins.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Effect of Air Particle Abrasion and Primers on Bond Strength to 3D-Printed Crown Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: 3D-printed permanent resins have recently been introduced to produce permanent restorations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of surface treatment methods on the shear-bond strength (SBS) between 3D-printed permanent resins and adhesive cement. Material and Methods: In this study, samples were produced using digital light projection (DLP) and stereolithography (SLA) 3D printers with two permanent resins (Crowntec, Saremco and Permanent Crown, Formlabs) in accordance with manufacturer guidelines. The samples were separated into three groups: sandblasting, hydrofluoric acid and no surface treatment. The surface profile (Ra, Sa) of the samples was examined with a confocal microscope (Smartproof 5, Zeiss). Then, a self-adhesive resin cement was applied to the samples in a transparent mold (2.38 mm diameter) in accordance with ISO 29022:2013. A universal testing machine was used to perform SBS test. A stereomicroscope was used to analyze the different types of fractures. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to assess the data ( Results: The samples with sandblasting applied to the surface showed higher surface roughness values than the samples with hydrofluoric acid ( Conclusions: When sandblasting was applied to the surface of the samples prepared using permanent resins, higher adhesion was achieved with adhesive cement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.