ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular molars: A cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography study.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The first tooth to erupt is the first mandibular molar, which is the tooth with the highest number of retreatments. Several factors are responsible for the failure of the endodontic success and one of the most important being the particular pulp anatomy of each tooth. To aim was determine the prevalence of the middle mesial (MM) canal in first mandibular molars and to study if there are predisposing factors to the presence of this canal by retrospectively analyzing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in vivo. Material and Methods: CBCT images of 100 patients were selected. A total of 206 first mandibular molars were examined. The CBCTs were analysed using Careastream CS 3D imaging software. Findings of MM canals were recorded along the variables sex and left/right side. Prevalence was compared using the Chi-square test ( Results: Of the 206 teeth analysed, the prevalence of MM canals was 33.11% (49 teeth). There was no statistically significant difference between sex and prevalence of the MM canal. There was a significant difference between sex and the distance between the mesial canals was found, being the most common range in women was 1-2 mm (35.8%) and 2-3 mm (51%) in men. The most common range of distance between the mesial canals where the MM canal was localized was 3-4 mm (50%), being statistically significant ( Conclusions: This cross-sectional study showed a high prevalence of MM canals (33.11%) in first mandibular molars. The prevalence of the MM canal was significantly higher when the distance between mesiobucal and mesiolingual canals was 3-4mm. This knowledge let direct the clinicians in locating MM canal for improving endodontic prognosis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.