Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399848›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024

Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D printer resins for occlusal splints using different models of 3D printers.

Arthur Simoes Seidler, Lucas Simino de Melo, João Pedro Justino de Oliveira Limirio, Aldieris Alves Pesqueira, Leandro Augusto Hilgert, Rodrigo Antonio de Medeiros

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arthur Simoes SeidlerDS, Graduation student, Department of Dentistry, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, Federal District, Brazil.
Lucas Simino de MeloDDS, postgraduate student at Department of Dentistry, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, Federal District, Brazil.
João Pedro Justino de Oliveira LimirioDDS, MS, postgraduate student at Aracatuba Dental School, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Aracatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Aldieris Alves PesqueiraDDS, MS, PhD, Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Aracatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Leandro Augusto HilgertDDS, MS, PhD, Professor, Department of Dentistry, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, Federal District, Brazil.
Rodrigo Antonio de MedeirosDDS, MS, PhD, Professor, Department of Dentistry, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, Federal District, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Considering the development of new 3D printing technologies that use different printing techniques, further studies must be conducted to evaluate the impact of different printing systems on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed materials. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3D-printed materials for occlusal devices using different 3D printers and printing layer thicknesses. Material and Methods: Ninety rectangular samples were manufactured and divided into nine groups according to the 3D printer model they were printed on (AnyCubic Mono X, Elegoo Mars 2, or FlashForge Hunter) and the layer thickness (20, 50, or 100 µm) and were subjected to superficial microhardness, flexural resistance, and elasticity modulus tests. The results were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's statistical tests, with a significance level of 5%. Results: The type of 3D printer significantly affected superficial microhardness ( Conclusions: Variations in printing systems and layer thicknesses can impact the mechanical properties of 3D-printed materials.

Identifiers

PMID39399848
PMCPMC11470457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.