Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399847›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024

Tania Carola Padilla-Cáceres, Heber Arbildo-Vega, Vilma Mamani-Cori, Luz Caballero-Apaza, Manuela Daishy Casa-Coila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tania Carola Padilla-CáceresDepartment of General Dentistry, Dentistry School, University of the Altiplano, Puno 21001, Peru.
Heber Arbildo-VegaDepartment of General Dentistry, Dentistry School, San Martín de Porres University, Chiclayo 14012, Peru.
Vilma Mamani-CoriDepartment of General Dentistry, Dentistry School, University of the Altiplano, Puno 21001, Peru.
Luz Caballero-ApazaDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing, University of the Altiplano, Puno 21001, Peru.
Manuela Daishy Casa-CoilaFaculty of Educational Sciences, Study Program: Science, Technology and Environment, University of the Altiplano, Puno 21001, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prolonged use of pediatric syrups without adequate control of oral hygiene can cause effects on the physical characteristics of the restoration materials, which in turn can cause deterioration of the material and subsequent carious recurrence. Aim: To evaluate the effect of two long-term use syrups in children on the microhardness and surface roughness of three restorative materials. Material and Methods: Three study groups were formed, consisting of a conventional self-curing ionomer cement, a light-curing ionomer cement, and a light-curing composite resin. Each group had 40 specimens made with the respective restorative material; in addition, these were distributed in 2 subgroups with 20 specimens each, which were immersed in Paracetamol and Ferrous Sulfate in syrup following a protocol that consisted of 2 minutes each day for 28 days. Results: Over time (0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days), when evaluating microhardness, the composite resin subgroup exposed to ferrous sulfate ( Conclusions: The more days of exposure to ferrous sulphate syrup, the less the microhardness of the composite resin decreases; something similar occurs with the microhardness of Ketac Molar ionomeric cement when exposed to Paracetamol syrup. Meanwhile, the surface roughness of the composite resin and Ketac Molar ionomeric cement increases considerably when exposed to ferrous sulphate.

Identifiers

PMID39399847
PMCPMC11470455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.