ArticleRadiologia brasileira
Look-Locker T1 relaxometry and high-resolution T2 in the evaluation of lung lesions: a single-center prospective study.
Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the feasibility of two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences-high-resolution T2-weighted (HR T2) and Look-Locker T1 (LL T1) relaxometry-for the investigation focal lung lesions (FLLs). As a secondary objective, we analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of these sequences. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study involving 39 subjects with FLLs scanned in a 1.5-T MRI system with LL T1 relaxometry and HR T2 sequences focused on the FLL region, in addition to a conventional protocol. All images were evaluated by two radiologists, working independently, who were blinded to other findings. Results: Most of the examinations (31 of the LL T1 relaxometry sequences and 36 of the HR T2 sequences) were of adequate diagnostic quality. Nondiagnostic examinations were considered so mainly because of limited coverage of the sequences. Of the FLLs studied, 19 were malignant, 17 were benign, and three were excluded from the accuracy analysis because there was no definitive diagnosis. Although LL T1 relaxometry could not distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, the signal intensity at its first inversion time (160 ms) differed between the two groups. The HR T2 sequence was considered the best sequence for assessing specific morphological characteristics, especially pseudocavities and pleural tags. We found that MRI showed better accuracy than did computed tomography (86% vs. 74%). Conclusion: Both MRI sequences are feasible for the evaluation of FLLs. Images at 160 ms of the LL T1 relaxometry sequence helped distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, and the HR T2 sequence was considered the best sequence for evaluating specific morphological characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.