ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Risk Factors for High Repair Tension During Rotator Cuff Repair.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of modified double-row suture bridge technique versus traditional single-row repair for massive rotator cuff tears with preserved muscle quality (Goutallier stage < 2): a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of modified Kessler tension-reducing suturing combined with double-row repair for Patte II-III rotator cuff tears.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for re-tear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Repair integrity and clinical outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under low repair tension.JSES international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Excessively high repair tension, especially tension ≥10 N, can lead to unsuccessful rotator cuff repair. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to identify the preoperative risk factors for high repair tension in rotator cuff repair. It was hypothesized was that older age, longer symptom duration, nontraumatic (ie, degenerative) tear onset, progressive fatty degeneration, and larger tear size would be among the risk factors. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This retrospective study involved 80 patients (80 shoulders) diagnosed with rotator cuff tears by magnetic resonance imaging between July 2018 and August 2020. Repair tension was measured intraoperatively using a digital tension meter. Risk factors for high repair tension (≥10 N) were evaluated. The Results: Symptom duration of ≥4 months, nontraumatic tear onset, large/massive tears, mediolateral (ML) tear length of ≥20 mm, and anteroposterior (AP) tear length of ≥18 mm were associated with high odds of repair tension ≥10 N ( Conclusion: The independent risk factors for high repair tension (≥10 N) during rotator cuff repair were nontraumatic tear onset, ML tear length of ≥20 mm, and AP tear length of ≥18 mm. Symptom duration of ≥4 months and large/massive tears were associated with high odds of repair tension ≥10 N, although they were not considered independent risk factors. Prospective cohort studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the clinical value of the risk factors identified in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.