ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Reliability and Validity of an Ultrasound-Derived Measure for Axial Patellofemoral Alignment.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic Ultrasound Assessment of Axial Extensor Mechanism Alignment in Adolescents With and Without Patellofemoral Instability.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Axial extensor mechanism alignment is routinely assessed in patients with patellofemoral instability.Although many of these assessments are described using magnetic resonance imaging, it is plausible that ultrasound (US) imaging could be utilized to provide similar information in a more cost-effective and time-efficient manner. Purpose: To (1) describe and assess the reliability of a novel measure of extensor mechanism alignment of the patellofemoral joint using musculoskeletal US and (2) establish the construct validity of this measure through comparison of patients with and without patellar instability. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with (n = 24; 14.2 ± 3.1 years; 83% female) and without (n = 26; 14.7 ± 2.8 years; 69% female) a clinical history of patellofemoral instability (PFI) participated. Extensor mechanism alignment was assessed bilaterally on US, measuring the distance between the midpoint of the patellar tendon to the lateral trochlear ridge (MPT-LTR). Interrater reliability of the measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with a minimum of 1 week between measurements for test-retest reliability. Differences between limbs were assessed using paired-samples Results: Patients with PFI demonstrated a significantly smaller MPT-LTR distance than healthy controls on both their involved (8.1 ± 3.6 vs 12.6 ± 2.6 mm) and uninvolved (8.9 ± 3.4 vs 12.9 ± 2.4 mm) limbs ( Conclusion: The US-based MPT-LTR distance demonstrated good-to-excellent reliability. When compared with controls, the MPT-LTR distance was smaller in patients with PFI, indicating greater lateralization of the extensor mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.