ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Effectiveness of bespoke or customised orthotic treatment in plantar pressure reduction of the central metatarsals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Plantar Pressure Distribution in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Conservative treatment is the first therapeutical option for central heads metatarsalgia, a common foot condition. However, to our best knowledge, systematic review and meta-analysis of its effectiveness in terms of plantar pressure improvement have not been yet carried out. Our aim was to answer the following research question: Is bespoke or customized orthotic treatment effective for plantar pressure reduction in patients with mechanical metatarsalgia in the central metatarsal heads? Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bespoke or customised orthotic treatment in terms of plantar pressure reduction beneath the central -2nd to 4th - metatarsal heads in mechanical metatarsalgia patients were carried out. Pubmed database was searched from September to November 2022. All type of related-topic studies were included. Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias of each study. Descriptive and frequency analyses were performed with SPSS 25.0 software. Review Manager v5.4.1 software was used to analyse the data using the inverse variance method for continuous outcomes according to a fixed or random effects model. Results: A total of 5 studies met our inclusion criteria, with 158 participants. Bespoke or customised orthotic treatment is effective for the improvement of plantar pressure under 2nd to 4th metatarsal heads in mechanical metatarsalgia patients (MD -37.54 [95 % CI -65.84, -9.24], p = 0.009). Customised orthotic treatment is more effective than no treatment in terms of reducing plantar pressure (MD -78.63 [95 % CI -119.70, -39.16], p = 0.0002), but its effectiveness is similar to standardised footwear, standardised foot orthoses and isolated metatarsal domes. Conclusions: We found conservative bespoke or customised orthotic treatment to be effective for the improvement of plantar pressure under the central metatarsal heads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.