ArticleMetabolism open2024
Tea intake and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease risk: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Metabolism open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tea and liver fibrosis: a bibliometric analysis of mechanisms, translational challenges, and emerging trends.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Association Between Dietary Tea Consumption and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Dose-response relationship between tea consumption and mortality, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Association of behavioral factors, liver function and NAFLD: Bayesian Mendelian randomization.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Article
- Synergistic potential of natural products and exercise: unveiling molecular mechanisms and innovative therapeutic approaches for liver diseases.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major global health problem due to its great disease and economic burdens. Tea is a popular beverage consumed by billions of people.globally owing to its health benefits. However, the evidence regarding the association between tea intake and NAFLD risk is inconsistent. Objective: To examine the genetically predicted causal association between tea intake and NAFLD risk using the two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method. Methods: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) strongly associated with tea intake were obtained from a large dataset (N = 447,485) in the UK biobank, and summary-level genetic data for NAFLD (2,275 cases and 375,002 controls) were collected from the FinnGen consortium. The two-sample MR method was used to investigate the causal association between tea intake and NAFLD risk. The random-effects inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was used as the primary approach for estimating the causal effect, and MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode were used to verify the robustness of the primary results. Results: Twenty-four valid SNPs were selected as the instrumental variables for tea intake. The IVW results indicated that tea intake was not causally associated with NAFLD risk (Odds ratio: 1.48; 95 % confidence interval: 0.64, 3.43; Conclusion: Our results do not support tea intake being causally associated with a decreased risk of NAFLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.