ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024
Screening, investigation and follow-up of neonates with small for gestational age in a metropolitan hospital in Australia-observational retrospective study.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infants with small for gestational age (SGA) have an increased risk of short and long-term health outcomes, with potentially modifiable risk factors. This study aims to determine the prenatal risk factors associated SGA and evaluate the clinical management of affected infants. Methods: An observational retrospective study of medical records of infants born at Nepean Hospital and discharged with a diagnosis of SGA over 5 years (1 Results: Six hundred and seven infants had a discharge diagnosis of SGA, from 20,392 infants born. Of the 607 infants identified, 487 (80%) had SGA, 97 (16%) had asymmetrical SGA, 175 (29%) had symmetrical SGA, and 50 (8%) were incorrectly diagnosed with SGA based on growth measurements taken at birth. The most prevalent maternal risk factors were the presence of chronic disease (n=402, 66.23%), current smoking (n=159, 26.19%), social work input (n=108, 17.79%), gestational diabetes mellitus (n=96, 15.82%) and Aboriginal background (n=73, 12.03%). Prenatal genetic testing was conducted in 89.62% (n=544); 58.81% (n=357) had placental abnormalities; 36.57% (n=222) were recommended follow-up with a general practitioner (GP) and paediatrician, and 21.09% (n=128) were recommended a combination of midwifery in the home (MITH), GP, and paediatric follow-up. Two infants were recorded with no follow-up. Conclusions: Diagnostic inaccuracies were found in infants with SGA. More intensive antenatal care for women with risk factors for SGA might improve the health of those with chronic disease; support for smoking cessation could also be offered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.