Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399680›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Development and validation of experimental induction tasks for worry and rumination: A comparison of scripted and personalized approaches.

Hanjoo Kim, Michelle Newman

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanjoo KimUniversity of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-6891-2733
Michelle NewmanPennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0003-0873-1409

Funding

Harnessing Mobile Technology to Reduce Mental Health Disorders in College PopulationsR01MH115128 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EISENBERG, DANIEL, NEWMAN, MICHELLE G · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worry and rumination are two forms of repetitive negative thoughts. Prior studies have identified similarities and differences between these two states. For a more comprehensive understanding of these thought processes, researchers need reliable methods to induce them experimentally. Traditionally, researchers have used either scripted or personalized approaches to trigger worry and rumination, but it remains unclear which method is more effective. Additionally, the potential impact of preexisting disorders like generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) or major depression (MDD) on these inductions is not well understood. This study aimed to compare scripted and personalized induction methods to identify which was more effective for eliciting worry and rumination, while also considering the potential influence of generalized anxiety and depression. Participants (

Indexed as

experimentinductionrepetitive negative thoughtruminationworry

Identifiers

PMID39399680
PMCPMC11469516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.