ArticleCancer management and research2024
Predicting the Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer Based on Machine Learning.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Liver Metastasis at Diagnosis and Overall Survival in Ovarian Cancer: A SEER-Based Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Identification of novel biomarkers for epithelial ovarian cancer through machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence using in silico and in vitro analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging machine learning models to evaluate immune infiltration in the ovarian cancer microenvironment: a single-cell analysis approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrence is the main factor for poor prognosis in ovarian cancer, but few prognostic biomarkers were reported. In this study, we used machine learning methods based on multiple biomarkers to develop a specific prediction model for the recurrence of ovarian cancer. Methods: A total of 277 ovarian cancer patients were enrolled in this study and randomly classified into training and testing cohorts. The prediction information was obtained through 47 clinical parameters using six supervised clustering machine learning algorithms, including K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Results: In predicting the recurrence of ovarian cancer, machine learning algorithm was superior to conventional logistic regression analysis. In this study, XGBoost showed the best performance in predicting the recurrence of ovarian cancer, with an accuracy of 0.95. In addition, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Monocyte ratio (MONO%), Hematocrit (HCT), Prealbumin (PAB), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) are the most important biomarkers to predict the recurrence of ovarian cancer. Conclusion: The machine learning techniques can achieve a more accurate assessment of the recurrence of ovarian cancer, which can help clinicians make decisions, and develop personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.