ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024
AI diagnostics in bone oncology for predicting bone metastasis in lung cancer patients using DenseNet-264 deep learning model and radiomics.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent Orthopedics: Machine Learning in Diagnosis of Bone Disease, Implants, and Bone Health Monitoring.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review of Recent Advances in Diagnosis, Biomarker Discovery, and Drug Development.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Bone Metastasis Management: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to predict bone metastasis in lung cancer patients using radiomics and deep learning. Early prediction of bone metastasis is crucial for timely intervention and personalized treatment plans. This can improve patient outcomes and quality of life. By integrating advanced imaging techniques with artificial intelligence, this study seeks to enhance predictive accuracy and clinical decision-making. Methods: We included 189 lung cancer patients, comprising 89 with non-bone metastasis and 100 with confirmed bone metastasis. Radiomic features were extracted from CT images, and feature selection was performed using Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). We developed and validated a radiomics model and a deep learning model using DenseNet-264. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Statistical comparisons were made using the DeLong test. Results: The radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.815 on the training set and 0.778 on the validation set. The DenseNet-264 model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.990 on the training set and 0.971 on the validation set. The DeLong test confirmed that the AUC of the DenseNet-264 model was significantly higher than that of the radiomics model (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The DenseNet-264 model significantly outperforms the radiomics model in predicting bone metastasis in lung cancer patients. The early and accurate prediction provided by the deep learning model can facilitate timely interventions and personalized treatment planning, potentially improving patient outcomes. Future studies should focus on validating these findings in larger, multi-center cohorts and integrating clinical data to further enhance predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.