Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399584›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024

AI diagnostics in bone oncology for predicting bone metastasis in lung cancer patients using DenseNet-264 deep learning model and radiomics.

Taisheng Zeng, Yusi Chen, Daxin Zhu, Yifeng Huang, Ying Huang, Yijie Chen, Jianshe Shi, Bijiao Ding, Jianlong Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Taisheng ZengFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Yusi ChenFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Daxin ZhuFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Yifeng HuangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Huaqiao University Affliated Strait Hospital, Quanzhou, Fujian 362000, China.
Ying HuangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Huaqiao University Affliated Strait Hospital, Quanzhou, Fujian 362000, China.
Yijie ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Huaqiao University Affliated Strait Hospital, Quanzhou, Fujian 362000, China.
Jianshe ShiDepartment of General Surgery, Huaqiao University Affliated Strait Hospital, Quanzhou, Fujian 362000, China.
Bijiao DingDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Huaqiao University Affliated Strait Hospital, Quanzhou, Fujian 362000, China.
Jianlong HuangFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to predict bone metastasis in lung cancer patients using radiomics and deep learning. Early prediction of bone metastasis is crucial for timely intervention and personalized treatment plans. This can improve patient outcomes and quality of life. By integrating advanced imaging techniques with artificial intelligence, this study seeks to enhance predictive accuracy and clinical decision-making. Methods: We included 189 lung cancer patients, comprising 89 with non-bone metastasis and 100 with confirmed bone metastasis. Radiomic features were extracted from CT images, and feature selection was performed using Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). We developed and validated a radiomics model and a deep learning model using DenseNet-264. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Statistical comparisons were made using the DeLong test. Results: The radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.815 on the training set and 0.778 on the validation set. The DenseNet-264 model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.990 on the training set and 0.971 on the validation set. The DeLong test confirmed that the AUC of the DenseNet-264 model was significantly higher than that of the radiomics model (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The DenseNet-264 model significantly outperforms the radiomics model in predicting bone metastasis in lung cancer patients. The early and accurate prediction provided by the deep learning model can facilitate timely interventions and personalized treatment planning, potentially improving patient outcomes. Future studies should focus on validating these findings in larger, multi-center cohorts and integrating clinical data to further enhance predictive accuracy.

Indexed as

Bone MetastasisCancerDeep Learning DiagnosisDenseNet-264Radiomics

Identifiers

PMID39399584
PMCPMC11470571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.