Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399573›Full record

ReviewNeurology. Clinical practice2025

Radiographic Horizontal Conjugate Gaze Deviation: Clinical Correlates.

Shervin Badihian, Elias Samaha, David E Newman-Toker, David S Zee, Jorge C Kattah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shervin BadihianDepartment of Neurology (SB), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (ES, JCK), University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria; and Departments of Neurology (DEN-T, DSZ), Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-3061
Elias SamahaDepartment of Neurology (SB), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (ES, JCK), University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria; and Departments of Neurology (DEN-T, DSZ), Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2255-002X
David E Newman-TokerDepartment of Neurology (SB), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (ES, JCK), University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria; and Departments of Neurology (DEN-T, DSZ), Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2789-4115
David S ZeeDepartment of Neurology (SB), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (ES, JCK), University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria; and Departments of Neurology (DEN-T, DSZ), Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3909-2494
Jorge C KattahDepartment of Neurology (SB), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (ES, JCK), University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria; and Departments of Neurology (DEN-T, DSZ), Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6146-5678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: The potential diagnostic value of radiographic, horizontal, conjugate gaze deviation (Rad h-CGD) was first recognized in 2003 by Simon et al. Thereafter, interest grew related to its potential use as a marker of different neurologic and vestibular disorders. Over the past 20 years, we have identified clinical correlates of Rad h-CGD including those caused by supratentorial and infratentorial lesions. We propose clinicians and radiologists will better diagnose and manage patients by knowing the different diagnostic possibilities for Rad h-CGD. Findings: We report different clinical correlates of Rad h-CGD relevant for localizing and lateralizing lesions. We measured the angle of deviation and correlated it with the clinical findings and underlying mechanisms. We then reviewed important data from the previous literature relevant to the localization of each lesion and combined it with our experience into the design of a practical algorithm to interpret Rad h-CGD. Summary: Using Rad h-CGD provides useful information about the diagnosis and localization and may reveal subtle ocular findings not clear on physical examination. However, Rad h-CGD alone cannot distinguish between supratentorial and infratentorial lesions, and therefore, the clinical context is critical. Moreover, although Rad h-CGD occurs with strokes due to large vessel occlusion, it could also be seen with an acute vestibular syndrome, secondary to a peripheral vestibular neuritis. Other possibilities include ischemic events in the cerebellum, brainstem, and labyrinth.

Identifiers

PMID39399573
PMCPMC11464262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.