ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Tea leaf disease and insect identification based on improved MobileNetV3.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Green-Making Stage Recognition of Tieguanyin Tea Based on Improved MobileNet V3.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- A curated dataset and lightweight deep learning framework for tea leaf disease classification.PloS one · 2026Article
- Applying the transfer learning models on the dataset on the effect of diseases on Nagvel-betel (Piper betle) leaves.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Tea Disease Detection Method Based on Improved YOLOv8 in Complex Background.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- IoT-driven smart assistive communication system for the hearing impaired with hybrid deep learning models for sign language recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate detection of tea leaf diseases and insects is crucial for their scientific and effective prevention and control, essential for ensuring the quality and yield of tea. Traditional methods for identifying tea leaf diseases and insects primarily rely on professional technicians, which are difficult to apply in various scenarios. This study proposes a recognition method for tea leaf diseases and insects based on improved MobileNetV3. Initially, a dataset containing images of 17 different types of tea leaf diseases and insects was curated, with data augmentation techniques utilized to broaden recognition scenarios. Subsequently, the network structure of MobileNetV3 was enhanced by integrating the CA (coordinate attention) module to improve the perception of location information. Moreover, a fine-tuning transfer learning strategy was employed to optimize model training and accelerate convergence. Experimental results on the constructed dataset reveal that the initial recognition accuracy of MobileNetV3 is 94.45%, with an F1-score of 94.12%. Without transfer learning, the recognition accuracy of MobileNetV3-CA reaches 94.58%, while with transfer learning, it reaches 95.88%. Through comparative experiments, this study compares the improved algorithm with the original MobileNetV3 model and other classical image classification models (ResNet18, AlexNet, VGG16, SqueezeNet, and ShuffleNetV2). The findings show that MobileNetV3-CA based on transfer learning achieves higher accuracy in identifying tea leaf diseases and insects. Finally, a tea diseases and insects identification application was developed based on this model. The model showed strong robustness and could provide a reliable reference for intelligent diagnosis of tea diseases and insects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.