ArticleFASEB bioAdvances2024
Gene expression analysis identifies hub genes and pathways distinguishing fatal from survivor outcomes of Ebola virus disease.
Article in FASEB bioAdvances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ebola virus and Sudan virus infection in humans: a comparison to inform vaccine research and development.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Review
- Gene expression analysis identifies hub genes and pathways distinguishing fatal from survivor outcomes of Ebola virus disease.FASEB bioAdvances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Ebola virus poses a severe public health threat, yet understanding factors influencing disease outcomes remains incomplete. Our study aimed to identify critical pathways and hub genes associated with fatal and survivor Ebola disease outcomes. We analyzed differentially expressed hub genes (DEGs) between groups with fatal and survival outcomes, as well as a healthy control group. We conducted additional analysis to determine the functions and pathways associated with these DEGs. We found 13,198 DEGs in the fatal and 12,039 DEGs in the survival group compared to healthy controls, and 1873 DEGs in the acute fatal and survivor groups comparison. Upregulated DEGs in the comparison between the acute fatal and survivor groups were linked to ECM receptor interaction, complement and coagulation cascades, and PI3K-Akt signaling. Upregulated hub genes identified from the acute fatal and survivor comparison (FGB, C1QA, SERPINF2, PLAT, C9, SERPINE1, F3, VWF) were enriched in complement and coagulation cascades; the downregulated hub genes (IL1B, 1L17RE, XCL1, CXCL6, CCL4, CD8A, CD8B, CD3D) were associated with immune cell processes. Hub genes CCL2 and F2 were unique to fatal outcomes, while CXCL1, HIST1H4F, and IL1A were upregulated hub genes unique to survival outcomes compared to healthy controls. Our results demonstrate for the first time the association of EVD outcomes to specific hub genes and their associated pathways and biological processes. The identified hub genes and pathways could help better elucidate Ebola disease pathogenesis and contribute to the development of targeted interventions and personalized treatment for distinct EVD outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.